docs: Add Maestro Project to community showcase#173
Merged
Conversation
|
@shariqriazz is attempting to deploy a commit to the Roo Code Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
dosubot
Bot
added
size:S
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to f4dc0d1 in 1 minute and 18 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
35lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. docs/community/index.md:14
- Draft comment:
Ensure consistent project description format matching other entries in Docs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. docs/community/maestro.md:16
- Draft comment:
Add a newline at end-of-file to comply with markdown style guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While having a newline at end-of-file is a common convention, this kind of formatting issue should be handled by automated tools like Prettier or EditorConfig rather than manual code review comments. Our rules specifically mention that ESLint and Prettier should be set up to handle code style rules automatically. The comment is technically correct and the suggestion would improve the file's adherence to common conventions. It's also a very simple fix. However, our rules explicitly state that we should rely on automated tools for enforcing code style rules, and this is exactly the kind of thing that should be handled by Prettier or EditorConfig. The comment should be deleted as it addresses a formatting issue that should be handled by automated tools rather than manual review.
3. docs/community/maestro.md:16
- Draft comment:
Please add a newline at the end of this file to meet common formatting standards (POSIX convention). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_3yn5Z2hmfslZEwuT
You can customize 
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
added Maestro
Important
Adds Maestro Project to community showcase, detailing its orchestration of specialized modes for software lifecycle management.
Maestro Projecttodocs/community/index.mdfor comprehensive software development lifecycle management.maestro.mddescribes the Maestro Project, detailing its orchestration of specialized modes for tasks like planning, design, and testing.This description was created by
for f4dc0d1. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.